Movie Review: The Hangover Part II [2011]

The Hangover Part II

The Hangover Part II [2011]
Director: Todd Phillips
Genre: Comedy
Language: English
Country: USA

By all accounts, 2009’s The Hangover was a rousing success. It grossed a stunning $467 million worldwide and received generally positive acclaim from both critics (78% on Rotten Tomatoes) and casual moviegoers alike. Therefore, a sequel was inevitable. Two years later, here we are with The Hangover: Part II, a second effort that follows the original formula right down to a T.

Bradley Cooper, Ed Helms, Zach Galifianakis and Justin Bartha are back playing the same group of guys in the original Wolfpack. This time around Stu Price (Helms) is getting married in Thailand. Stu’s planned “Bachelor Brunch” is laughed at by his bros, and he is persuaded later that evening to go out for a beer. Of course, one beer turns into god-knows-how-many, and the fellas wake up with massive hangovers with similar predicaments as the last film.

The Hangover Part II

In lieu of a missing tooth (as in the first), Stu now has a face tattoo identical to Mike Tyson’s. Alan (Galifianakis) has a shaved head. Doug (Bartha) wisely abandoned the group after the aforementioned one beer, and he is resting peacefully at the resort. While Doug went missing in the first one, that honor goes to 16-year-old Teddy (Mason Lee), Stu’s future brother-in-law who joined in on the debauchery. His disappearance is even more frenzied because one of his fingers was found on the coffee table. Throw in a monkey in place of the first movie’s baby, and swap Las Vegas for Bangkok, and you essentially have the same comedy with a different coat of paint.

While the lack of originality is somewhat disconcerting, this comedy formula still works. Raunch is piled on to the point of excess, but that is what these type of comedies are all about. As one might expect with a movie set in Bangkok, more emphasis is put on the seedy underbelly of the city. Sex and drugs are heavily on display, and there is one extended scene at a strip club where Stu gets a little too friendly with a ladyboy. There is so much lewd behavior on hand that Zach Galifianakis swore never to show this movie to his mother. If you’re offended easily, you will want to skip out on this.

The Hangover Part II

There are some obvious issues with the movie. The acting is lackluster at times, especially when the group is actually at the wedding resort. Stu and his future wife Lauren (Jamie Chung) have no chemistry, and her performance is about as bad as they come. Ken Jeong is back as Mr. Chow and is as annoying as ever. I still don’t get the appeal for that guy, and I’m not sure why his micro-penis needs to be shown in both movies. Also, the ending wraps things up a bit too neatly, with huge problems being dismissed far too easily.

As it stands, The Hangover Part II is a darker, even raunchier version of the original, and it stays true to the form. Chances are if you liked the first one, you will like this as well. The movie has lost some of its charm, but it still provides enough laughs to keep things entertaining throughout. I’m not sure a third sequel is necessary, however.


7 thoughts on “Movie Review: The Hangover Part II [2011]

    • Eric says:

      Oh, almost certainly. This series has proved to be a cash cow, and I would be shocked if they didn’t go for at least one more sequel. I just hope they switch up the formula if/when it happens.

      Thanks for the comment, by the way. Hope to see you around.

  1. CMrok93 says:

    This one was just an overall huge disappointment even if it did have some funny moments along the line, thanks to the always fun cast. I just wish Todd Phillips actually tried something new here instead of just re-hashing the same crap we’ve seen done before. Good Review Though!

    • Eric says:

      Thanks, Dan. I actually went into this movie expecting to hate it after seeing so many negative reviews. I was pleasantly surprised with how much I enjoyed it, even if it was a deliberate re-hash of the original.

  2. Custard says:

    I really liked the first film. Thought it was super funny!!

    I have read lots of reviews damning it and it is nice to see one that is saying it is OK. Cool!1

    Thanks matey

    • Eric says:

      Yeah, I understand why so many people dislike it, but I still found it to be a fun time anyway. I think it helps to go into it with the realization that it is just like the first movie but with a different ‘skin’ so to speak.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s